Good outcomes from cardiac surgery in the over 70s

Objective—To determine the early mortality and major morbidity associated with cardiac surgery in the elderly. Design—Retrospective case record review study of 575 patients > 70 years old who underwent cardiac surgery at the Manchester Heart Centre between January 1990 and December 1996. Setting—Regional cardiothoracic centre. Subjects—Patients > 70 years old who underwent cardiac surgery. Main outcome measures—Comparison of 30 day mortality and incidence of major morbidity between patients > 70 years old and patients < 70 years old. Results—Of 4395 cardiac surgical operations, 575 operations (13.1%) were in patients aged > 70 years (mean (SD) 73.1 (3.2) years). The proportion of elderly patients rose progressively from 7.9% in 1990 to 16.5% in 1996. 334 patients (58.1%) had coronary artery bypass grafting alone, 91 patients (15.8%) had valve surgery alone, and 129 patients (22.4%) had combined valve surgery and bypass grafting. For isolated coronary artery bypass grafting, 30 day mortality in patients > 70 years was 3.9% compared with 1.3% in patients < 70 years (p < 0.001). 30 day mortality for isolated valve surgery in patients > 70 years was 7.7%. Isolated aortic valve replacement was the most common valvar procedure in patients > 70 years and carried the lowest mortality (4.3%). Additional coronary artery bypass grafting increased the mortality rate in patients > 70 years to 9.3% for all valve surgery and to 8.0% for aortic valve replacement. Major morbidity in patients > 70 years was low for all procedure types (stroke 1.9%, acute renal failure requiring dialysis 1.6%, perioperative myocardial infarction 0.5%). Conclusions—Early mortality and major morbidity is low for cardiac surgery in elderly patients. Concerns over the risk of cardiac surgery in the elderly should not prevent referral, and elderly patients usually do well. However, unconscious rationing of health care may aVect referral patterns, and studies that assess the cost eVectiveness of cardiac surgery versus conservative management in such patients are lacking. (Heart 1999;82:134–137)